Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:56
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
6 Foods You Should Eat More of After 60, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
‘How To Train Your Dragon’ Flying In With $200M+ Worldwide Bow – International Box Office - Deadline
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Astronomers Just Discovered The Biggest Explosions Since The Big Bang - ScienceAlert
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What do you typically do while on meth?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Omada Health Shares Soar After IPO as GLP-1 Drugs Fuel Interest - WSJ